바로가기 메뉴
본문 바로가기
푸터 바로가기
TOP

In-Su Han, Myung-Il Roh, Min-Chul Kong, Seong-Won Choi, Hwa-Sup Jang, Yeon-Hwa Jo, Gap-Heon Lee, “A Method for Identifying Revisions in Ship Drawings Using Change Detection and Synthetic Revision Generation”, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 365, No. 2,. 127269, 2026.09.01

In-Su Han, Myung-Il Roh, Min-Chul Kong, Seong-Won Choi, Hwa-Sup Jang, Yeon-Hwa Jo, Gap-Heon Lee, “A Method for Identifying Revisions in Ship Drawings Using Change Detection and Synthetic Revision Generation”, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 365, No. 2,. 127269, 2026.09.01
Publication Date2026-09-01
RoleCorresponding Author
CategorySCIE
Impact Factor6.3
Abstract
During ship drawing review, surveyors at classification societies manually compare original and revised drawings to verify that requested revisions have been reflected. This task is time-consuming and error-prone because composition inconsistency can disrupt one-to-one correspondence between drawing sets, requiring surveyors to match drawings before distinguishing subtle revisions from visual differences caused by alignment and quality inconsistencies in large-scale, information-dense drawings. This study proposed an automated method for revision identification using deep learning-based change detection. Corresponding drawings were matched using embedding-based image similarity to address composition inconsistency. To overcome the shortage of drawing data with labeled revision regions, synthetic training data were acquired from original drawings; synthetic revisions resembling actual revisions were generated through image inpainting and segmentation, while data augmentation reflected alignment and quality inconsistencies. A pretrained change detection model was fine-tuned on synthetic training data and applied to large, high-resolution drawings using an adapted sliding-window algorithm. Experiments on 40 drawing pairs from five shipyards and across different drawing types showed reliable, rapid matching. Revision identification achieved 98.13% precision, 98.99% recall, and a 98.56% F1-score, averaging 7.44 s per pair. The proposed method can help surveyors focus their review on identified revisions, thereby supporting efficient and consistent drawing review.
Ocean Engineering